Distilled Representations: On Miniature Vessels Found in Cult Context in Anatolia

Esen KAYA

Arkhaia Anatolika 3. Sayı

Arrival Date : 15.12.2020 | Acceptance Date : 25.12.2020

DOI : 10.32949/Arkhaia.2020.23 | Release Date : 28.12.2020 14:08:32

Summary

The miniature objects, the subjects of increasing research interest in recent years, are a group of finds frequently encountered in the domestic, funerary and cultic settings. The ongoing efforts to develop definitions and terminology alongside with the analytical attempts to discover the mindset behind miniaturization have had an impact in our attempt of perception of the nature of these objects. The miniature vessels stand as the expressions of miniaturization frequently -and often in large quantities- discovered in religious contexts. These vessels, the formerly assumed economic representations of their full-sized counterparts, are currently considered as the objects manipulating reality in line with the emotions.  This study aims to provide an overview of the research in the field through  a  survey  of  the  selected  examples  where  miniature  vessels  were  recorded  in religious context in Anatolia. The first part of the study gathers the analyses on the phenomenon of miniaturization and the miniatures with a special focus on the representation of miniature vessels in the cult context, providing the inferences of the setting, arrangement, functionality, quantity, emotion, and the role of these objects in ritual.

The second part of the study presents the examples displaying certain patterns among the centres where miniature vessels were found in the cult context in Anatolia. The miniature vessels have often been unearthed en masse in the deposits rather than in their original settings, which makes it difficult to interpret these objects evaluated based on the assumption that they gain meaning according to the context. However, some exceptional in situ contexts besides reflecting the religious arrangement of miniature vessels may also effectively identify the sacred space and/or define ritual and reach inferences of human behaviour. There are cases where these groups of finds were uncovered in already identified sacred spaces, whereas there are also some that these miniature vessels attribute “sacredness” to the spaces where they were found based on the vessel form, the assemblage and the setting.

Alroth 1988

B. Alroth, “The Positioning of Greek votive figurines”, Eds. R. Hägg – N. Marinatos – G. Nordquist, Early Greek cult practice, Proceedings of the fifth international symposium at the Swedish Institute at Athens, 26-29 June, 1986 (ActaAth-4°, 28), Stockholm, 1988, 195-203.

Bailey 2005

D. W. Bailey, Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic, London/New York, 2005.

Barfoed 2018

S. Barfoed, “The use of miniature pottery in Archaic-Hellenistic Greek sanctuaries: Considerations on terminology and ritual practice”, Opuscula 11 (2018), 111-126.

Barrett 2017

C. E. Barrett, “Egypt in Roman Visual and Material Culture”, Ed. G. Williams, Oxford Handbooks Online in Classical Studies, Oxford/New York, 2017.

Kaynak:http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935390-e-18

Bulba 2019a

M. Bulba, “Kaunos Demeter Kutsal Alanı: Mimarisi ve İdentifikasyonu”, TÜBA-AR 24 (2019), 209-236.

Bulba 2019b

M. Bulba, “Kaunos Demeter Kutsal Alanı: Kült Uygulamaları”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. IX:1 (2019), 57-78.

Doğan-Gürbüzer 2012

E. Doğan-Gürbüzer, Klaros Kazılarında Bulunmuş Olan Pişmiş Toprak Figürinler ve Kültler Açısından Değerlendirilmeleri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, 2012.

Ekroth 2003

G. Ekroth, “Small pots, poor people?: The use and function of miniature pottery as votive offerings in Archaic sanctuaries in the Argolid and the Corinthia”, Griechische Keramik im kulturellen Kontext: Akten des Internationalen Vasen-Symposions in Kiel vom 24. bis 28.9.2001 veranstaltet durch das Archäologishe Institut der Christian-Albrechts-Universitet zu Kiel, 2003, 35-37.

Ersoy et al. 2016

Y. Ersoy – İ. Hasdağlı – K. Uzun – C. Çetin, “Urla-Klazomenai Kazıları”, 37. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, II. Cilt, Ankara, 2016, 517-540.

Foxhall 2015

L. Foxhall, “Introduction: miniaturization”, World Archaeology, 47:1 (2015), 1-5.

Hammond 2009

L. Hammond, “Figurines, the miniature vase, and cultic space”, Eds. A. Schallin – P. Pakkanen, Encounters with Mycenaean figures and figurines, Papers presented at a seminar at the Swedish Institute at Athens, 27-29 April 2001, Stockholm, 2009.

Harmanşah 2012

Ö. Harmanşah, “Yalburt Yaylası (Ilgın, Konya) Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştırma Projesi, 2010 Sezonu Sonuçları”, 29. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, II. Cilt, Ankara, 2012, 335-360.

Insoll 2015

T. Insoll, Material Explorations in African Archaeology, Oxford, 2015.

Kıraç 2019

E. Kıraç, Antandros Örneğinde Sunu Olarak Hydriskoi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Manisa, 2019.

Knappett 2012

C. Knappett, “Meaning in Miniature: Semiotic Networks in Material Culture”, Eds. M. Jessen – N. Johanssen – H. J. Jensen, Excavating the Mind: Cross-sections Through Culture, Cognition and Materiality, Aarhus, 2012, 87-109.

Luce 2011

J.-M. Luce, “From Miniature Objects to Giant Ones: The Process of Defunctionalisation in Sanctuaries and Graves in Iron Age Greece”, Pallas 86 (2011), 53-73.

Müller-Karpe –

Müller-Karpe 2020

V. Müller-Karpe – A. Müller-Karpe, “Kayalıpınar-Samuha 2017 ve 2018 Kazıları”, 41. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, IV. Cilt, Ankara, 2020, 415-428.

Özbay 2016

A. Özbay, Klazomenai Karantina Adası Kuzey Yamacı Kazılarında Ele Geçen Pişmiş Toprak Figürinler. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, 2016.

Pfommer 1983

M. Pfrommer, Zur Typologie der Miniaturhydrien vom Humeitepe, IstMitt 33 (1983), 79-89.

Pilz 2011

O. Pilz, “The uses of small things and the semiotics of Greek miniature objects”, Pallas 86 (2011), 15-30.

Pişkin-Ayvazoğlu 2015

C. Pişkin-Ayvazoğlu, Klaros’ta Dionysos Kültü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, 2015.

Polat et al. 2008

G. Polat – Y. Polat – K. Yağız – T. Küçük – O. Zunal, “Antandros 2006 Yılı Kazıları”, 29. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, II. Cilt, Ankara, 2008, 455-476.

Raeck – Rumscheid 2010

W. Raeck – F. Rumscheid, “2008 Yılı Priene Çalışmaları”, 31. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, I. Cilt, Ankara, 2010, 39-57.

Salapata 2011

G. Salapata, “The More the Better? Votive Offerings in Sets”, Ed. A. Mackay, Australasian Society for Classical Studies 32 Selected Proceedings, 2011, 1-10.

Salapata 2015

G. Salapata, “Terracotta Votive Offerings in Sets or Groups”, Eds. S. Huysecom-Haxhi – A. Muller. Figurines grecques en contexte: Présence muette dans le sanctuaire, la tombe et la maison, Villeneuve d’Ascq, 2015, 179-197.

von Greave 2010

V. von Greave, “2007-2008 Milet Çalışmaları”, 31. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, IV. Cilt, Ankara, 2010, 135-157.

von Greave 2019

V. von Greave, “Die Arbeiten in Milet in den Jahren 2006-2011”, AA 2019:1, 1-289.

Yener 2009

K. A. Yener, “Alalakh (Aççana Höyük) 2007 Yılı Çalışmaları, 30. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, III. Cilt, Ankara, 2009, 285-296.

Yener 2017

K. A. Yener, “Cult and Ritual at Late Bronze Age II Alalakh: Hybridity and Power under Hittite Administration”, Ed. A. Mouton, Hittitology Today: Studies on Hittite and Neo-Hittite Anatolia in Honor of Emmanuel Laroche’s 100th Birthday/L’Hittitologie Aujourd’hui: Études sur l’Anatolie hittite et néo-hittite à l’occasion du centenaire de la naissance d’Emmanuel Laroche, İstanbul, 2017, 215-224.

E. Kaya, “Damıtılmış Temsiller: Anadolu’da Kült Kontekstinde Bulunan Minyatür Kaplar Üzerine”, Arkhaia Anatolika 3 (2020), 254-263. DOI: 10.32949/Arkhaia.2020.23

Share!